On November 4, 2004,without allowing me to read them, Wiltshire exhibited letters from parents and students denouncing my alleged "unprofessional behavior". In reality, the real purpose of the meeting was to pave the way for a manipulative I-heard-his-side-of-the-story-but-found-parents-allegations-substantiated report. I shot back : "I need copies of the letters before discussing any allegations you claim they made". The meeting went nowhere. The next day I received another letter, reproduced below, in a strange language.

The second letter is a gobbledygook, harder to decipher than a hieroglyph. You can guess the meaning only if you know the context as I do .

In effect, Wiltshire is saying that he understands he "cannot use any of these letters as a means of retaliating against students who wrote or signed them", when actually what he means is : you will receive copies of the letters if you promise, in writing, that you will not retaliate against students involved. After his inumeracy established, Wiltshire is displaying his illiteracy.That's what happens when you outsource your academic work.