On November 4, 2004,without allowing me to read them, Wiltshire exhibited letters from parents and students unhappy with my "unprofessional behavior". The real purpose of the meeting was to pave the way for a manipulative I-heard-his-side-of-the-story-but-found-parents-allegations-substantiated report. I shot back : "I need copies of the letters before discussing any allegations you claim they make". He insisted to no avail : I won't talk. He relented : I will receive the copies if I promise not to retaliate against students involved.To that effect he wrote another letter for me to sign ( shown further down) a couple of days later : I am not sure in what language it was written.

Without the introductory note at the top of the page, the following letter is a gobbledygook, harder to decipher than a hieroglyph : in effect, Wiltshire is saying that he understands he "cannot use any of these letters as a means of retaliating against students who wrote or signed them", and asking the teacher to sign a letter that does not concern him. This is not about typos. After his inumeracy, Wiltshire is displaying his illiteracy.That's what happens when you outsource your academic work.